Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Destination: Nowhere

Steve Berkowitz, the Microsoft Senior Vice President of Online Services, made what I consider to be a stunning admission of defeat.

Here’s the context: quoted in Mary Jo Foley’s blog, from his presentation at the JP Morgan technology conference, Berkowitz makes the distinction between “destination search” and “convenience search.”  Destination search, effectively, is search conducted at a search site.  Convenience search is performed in-place, through some context-sensitive search facility in an application or Web page.

Berkowitz believes Microsoft is more likely to have a good showing in convenience search than in destination search.  Implicit in this assertion is that (a) Microsoft doesn’t believe it currently has a good showing in either search area and (b) MS believes it is very unlikely that it will ever have a good showing in the destination search arena.  In other words, people who want to go to a search engine will go to Google, and MSN/Live Search’s (last?) best hope is essentially as a mashup Web service.

While I’m glad to see Microsoft admit that no one takes its http://search.live.com page terribly seriously, I have to say I’m a little shocked to see them write off the whole prospect of improving and competing in the “destination search” arena.  And besides, to admit that your search engine is second-class but to assume people will use it anyway as an in-place service strikes me as somewhat contradictory.  Select/Ctrl-C/Ctrl-E/Ctrl-V/Enter isn’t that hard.

Especially if it gives back better results.

#    |
 Sunday, May 20, 2007

Tech Lively

Ever since I was a high scool student programming on a Commodore 64, I thought that the New York City Subway system could benefit greatly from technology.  All the way back then I tried, in vain, to create an electronic version of the Subway map and dreamed of a more high-tech system.

So imagine my surprise and geeky delight, when last Thursday morning I boarded a Queens-bound N train at Union Square that was made up of what, I have since learned, are called the R160 subway car.  From the outside, these look almost identical to the cars used on the L train (which I belive are R143 cars), but inside there’s something much different.

The R163s have special electronic strip maps…every station on the map is displayed via LEDs, rather than simple light bulbs on printed maps:

Img176

Take a closer look at the train route and destination info in the panel to the left of the map:

Img175

That square is actually a video screen, and it displays messages and full motion video announcments from the MTA alternating with the route info.

Anyway, as the train moves along its route, the station that the train just left disappears off the map, and everything scrolls to the left.  The train shows the next 10 stops (or the current one and nine more), as well as several “further stops” and the very last stop (if necessary).  It also tells you how many stops away each station is (and for the “further stops” that has to be calculated):

Img177

How cool is that?  By the way, I hear it’s now illegal to take photographs in the subway.  Oh well.  Here are links to some other lawbreakers who took photos and videos of the R160 and “FIND” (Flexible Information and Navigation Display — the official name of the electronic map):


NYCSubway.org Photos


'>
'>

#    |
 Saturday, May 19, 2007

The Brust Boys

The Brust Boys

Andrew, Sean (born May 9th, 4:11am) and Miles

#    |

Web Advertising A Go-Go

Who did the best?  Google with DoubleClick for $3.1 billion, Microsoft with aQuantive for $6 billion, or WPP with 24/7 Real Media for $649 million?  I vote for WPP, and not just because they spent less.  WPP knows advertising and WPP knows acquisitions.  WPP’s holdings include Grey, Ogilvy & Mather, Young & Rubicam, and the former J. Walter Thompson Co.  Now that’s a conglomerate.  I think they can leverage their deal better than an online classified ads techie concern like Google or a software powerhouse like Microsoft.  And I also think they can offer a “better together” suite of services for print, television, radio and onlline.  Do I think Microsoft and Google will benefit from their deals?  I give Google a 90% chance and Microsoft 50%.  But do I think they’ll be the last two Web advertising platforms standing? No way.

#    |
 Thursday, March 29, 2007

VSLive! San Fran '07 Presentation Materials

Materials from my SQL CLR talk are here and from my Data Mining with Analysis Services 2005 and Excel 2007 talk are here
#    |